[2026:RJ-JP:13114] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4568/2025 Sh. Prabhat Sachdeva S/o Sh. Bhimsen Sachdeva, R/o A 1-705, Dsk Madhuban , Andheri , Kurla Road, Naer Aditi Fast Food Saki- naka, Andheri East Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400072. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Sh. Rajesh Raghav S/o Late Sh. Krishna Pal, Raghav, R/o B-153, 10-B Scheme, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan- 302018. 3. Sh. Mukesh Gupta S/o Laxmi Narayan Gupta, R/o 13A, Everest Vihar Colony, Behind Nio Clinic, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aditi Tank with Mr. Ankur Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Mahendra Singh Solanki HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/03/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.22/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 of IPC. 2. Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in person and has duly been identified by his counsel. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute between the parties is private in nature and during the pendency [2026:RJ-JP:13114] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4568/2025] of this petition, parties have resolved their dispute amicably and they have entered into compromise. Counsel submits that due to compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 and as such, the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.22/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) (Rajasthan) along with subsequent proceedings, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /339