Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 57725 (MAD)

Surendran v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Keeranur

CRL OP(MD)/14824/2026 · 2026-07-20

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.14824 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/07/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No.14824 of 2026 Surendran, S/o.Selvaraj, No.45,Kallar Street, Mosakudi, Mangathevanpatti, Kulathur Taluk, Pudukkottai District.. ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep BY, The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. (Crime No.203/2026). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Santhosh Kumar C Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.J.Vishnu, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.14824 of 2026 PRAYER :- C-33AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.203 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence under Section 303(2) of BNS Act, 2023 r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act, 1957, in Crime No. 203 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he illegally quarried three units of gravel sand in pond and transported the same in a tipper lorry bearing Registration No.TN 63 AV 7093. Hence, the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.14824 of 2026 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation in this case is still pending and no previous case has been registered against him. However, he oppose to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner has illegally quarried sand from pond which is the lifeline of various villages and since they also caused damage to the ecology and water body, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. (K R S J) 20.07.2026 vsg 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.14824 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR,J., vsg TO 1.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.14824 of 2026 Date : 20/07/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis