Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L.21. February 19, 2026. MNS.
FA No. 85 of 2025
Sabitri Gupta Vs. Prasanta Gupta
Ms. Neha Roy, Mr. Sujit Sahoo
… for the appellant.
1. An adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant at the time of call.
2. However, since the matter has been appearing for some of time in the list, we refuse such prayer.
3. FA No. 85 of 2025 is dismissed for default.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. There will be no order as to costs.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)