Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:3902
BA 1 st No.8 2 9 of 2 0 2 6 Khushnaseeb
……Applicant Vs. State of Uttarakhand
…Respondent Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant – Khushnaseeb, who has been accused in FIR No.30 of 2026, under Sections 3, 5 & 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 at Police Station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar.
4.
Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and has been made scapegoat. He further submits that the Applicant has no criminal history. It is also contended by the
learned counsel for the Applicant that the co-accused, namely, Shakeel, has been granted bail by this Court in BA 1st No.175 of 2026 vide judgment dated 11.02.2026.
5. The bail application of the Applicant has been vehemently opposed by the learned State Counsel.
6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail.
7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that the Applicant - Khushnaseeb, who has been accused in
FIR No.30 of 2026, under Sections 3, 5 & 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 at Police Station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court. The Applicant shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty granted to him.
( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.)
20.05.2026 Nitesh/