Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5771 (GAU)

RUHUL AMIN AND ORS v. EYAJUL ALI ALIAS EAZUL ALI AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/190/2026 · 2026-05-10

Kaushik Goswami

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010017042026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/190/2026 RUHUL AMIN AND ORS S/O LATE UHAB ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI, PO AND PS SIPAJHAR, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM. 784145 2: RUSTOM ALI S/O LATE UHAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI PO AND PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM. 784145 3: JUBAID ALI S/O LATE UHAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI PO AND PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM. 784145 4: BAKKAR ALI S/O LATE UHAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI PO AND PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM. 784145 5: IMDADUL HAQUE S/O LATE UHAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI Page No.# 2/3 PO AND PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM. 78414 VERSUS EYAJUL ALI ALIAS EAZUL ALI AND ORS S/O LATE FORID ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI, PO AND PS SIPAJHAR, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM. 784145 2:ASKAR ALI S/O LATE MABID ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHUKTABARI PO AND PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784145 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM REVENUE DEPT GUWAHATI ASSAM 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DARRANG MANGALDAI PO MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784125 5:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER REVENUE DARRANG MANGALDAI PO MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784125 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER SIPAJHAR REVENUE CIRCLE PO SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM 78414 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. ANANTA RAM MEDHI, MS. D NATH,MD. K AHMED,MS. K MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. M AHMED,SC, REVENUE Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 11.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. R. Medhi, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Mr. A. R. Medhi, learned counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, press to withdraw the present interlocutory application seeking impleadment of the petitioner as necessary party in WP(C) No. 768/2025 with liberty to re-file a fresh application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands disposed of with liberty to file a fresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant