Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 577 (PAT)

Aamir Alam @ Ameer Alam v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./9304/2026 · 2026-02-19

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9304 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-583 Year-2025 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Aamir Alam @ Ameer Alam S/o Md. Shamshad Alam @ Mohammad Shamshad Alam R/o Village - Bhalua - 1, P.S - Belaganj, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the possession of one Md. Iqbal Naiyar, one regular rifle and sixteen live cartridges were recovered. On being asked, Iqbal disclosed that the petitioner has supplied him the arms and ammunition. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9304 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 case. He also submits that the name of this petitioner has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused namely, Md. Iqbal Naiyar. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 13.10.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 583 of 2025. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T