[2026:RJ-JP:13163] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3702/2026 Mohammadi W/o Iliyas, R/o Village Daika, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail, Tijara). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Rohan Singh on behalf of Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.229/2021 registered at Police Station Tijara District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) under Sections 147,148,149,323,341,307,302 of IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that by way of the instant FIR the informant has implicated entire family/relatives, making it more then dozen a number. It is submitted that applicant has a family to be support and that the applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against himself. It is also apprised that in the instant case, co-accused and main accused namely Liyakat, Hasan Mushtaq, Faiyaz Ali Mohammad and Rojin are already enlarged on bail. Further, learned counsel has relied upon order passed in Khet Singh vs. State of Rajasthan: S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. [2026:RJ-JP:13163] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3702/2026] 5554/2024, and submitted that in the matter at hand also, parity should be maintained. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. He has submitted that accused- applicant was absconding however, was arrested on 03.02.2026. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that accused- applicant is a lady, who has her entire family to be taken care of; that the applicant is in custody since 03.02.2026; that it was an inter se dispute between the parties regarding some petty quarrel and looking to the overall facts, inter alia, age, gender, role of the applicant-accused and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicant and enlarge her on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mohammadi W/o Iliyas shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J SHIVAM-AMAN /21