Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5764 (CHH)

GOUTAM SONA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2152/2025 · 2026-03-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11638-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2152 of 2025 1 - Goutam Sona S/o J.C. Sen, Aged About 27 Years R/o Padum Nagar, Charoda, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent Of Police, District Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Station House Officer, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - Kiran Gupta S/o Yogendra Gupta, Aged About 21 Years R/o Bombay Awas, Dadar Road, Charoda, Purani Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh (Complainant) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 11/03/2026 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.03.12 15:02:17 +0530 2 1. Heard Mr. Achyut Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the Respondent/State, Mr, Vikas Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and further be pleased to quash/set- aside the impugned FIR bearing Crime No. 240/2025 (Annexure P/1), registered at Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) under Section 138, 296, 351(2), 3(5), 115(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and further investigation and proceedings only in relation to the present petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Mr. Achyut Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition as the investigation in the case has been completed and the charge-sheet has been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the respective respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the same, the present CRMP is dismissed as 3 withdrawn, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, with liberty to take recourse to law to challenge the charge-sheet, if so advised. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok