APHC010378262005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 595/2005 Between: 1. BODI MALLESWARI,, D/O. LATESURYANARAYANA R/O. DOOR .NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR-2. ...APPELLANT AND 1. BODI VEERA SWAMY, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA R/O BY THE SIDE OF ANNADANA SATRAM, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR-2. 2. BODI RANGA RAO, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA RAO R/O. D.NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR. 3. BODI VENKATESWARLU, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA RAO R/O. D.NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR. 4. BODI SREENIVASA RAO, S/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA RAO R/O. D.NO.4-9-48, 4TH LANE, NAYUDUPET, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section ___________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2005(SAMP 1222 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass the interim orders restraining the respondents/defendants from interering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the appellant/plaintiff in respect ofsuit schedule property, pending disposal of Second Appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2005(SAMP 2144 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2005(SAMP 17870 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 595/2005 JUDGMENT:- Learned counsel on both sides is present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo vide USR No.77170 of 2026 before the Registry seeking withdrawal of the Second Appeal and the same is placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Second Appeal. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Considering the said memo, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 20.07.2026 LSP