Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5763 (JHR)

SHOBRAJ PANNA SENGER @ SOBRAJ PANNA SENGER v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1445/2026 · 2026-04-08

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:10100] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1445 of 2026 Shobhraj Panna Senger @ Sobraj Panna Senger, aged about 25 years, S/O Vinay Senger, Resident of Village- Khutti Kewal Kala, P.O.+P.S. Huntergunj, District - Chatra, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 08.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hunterganj P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 324(5), 308(4), 351, 331(5), 305 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that main allegation is against Vinay Senger and the petitioner is only the accomplice of said Vinay Senger along with 33 villagers. She next submits that even the petitioner has not been named in the FIR, however, the name of the petitioner has come only on the basis of suspicion during the investigation. She further submits that the petitioner is preparing for higher studies. She also submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of going at the spot [2026:JHHC:10100] -2- along with Vinay Senger and trying to demolish the house of the informant. 5. In the FIR, the petitioner has not been named and subsequently, the name of the petitioner has surfaced and the only allegation is there against the petitioner that he is accomplice of one Vinay Senger and further the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition and he is preparing for his higher studies, in that view of the matter, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-08.04.2026 Amitesh/-