2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3567 BA1 No.754 of 2026 Shadab Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Prakash Chandra, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Crime No.102 of 2026 under Section 8/21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, P.S. Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that FIR is lodged with 2 hours delay, which creates serious doubt in the prosecution story. He submits that police has failed to comply with the provision of Section 50 of the NDPS Act. He further submits that the contraband named smack (heroin), weighing 6.2 gram, recovered from the possession of the applicant, is below the commercial quantity. 5. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Shadab be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 11.05.2026 Arti