Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5761 (KAR)

MANJUNATH S/O ADAPPA CHABBI v. GRAM PANCHAYAT

CCC/100457/2025 · 2026-02-10

B Muralidhara Pai, M I Arun

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1966-DB CCC No. 100457 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100457 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MANJUNATH S/O ADAPPA CHABBI, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HOSUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 193. - COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SANTOSH KUMAR B. MALLIGAWAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAJESHWARI LAMANI, GRAM PANCHAYAT, HOSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, TQ. SHIGGAON, DIST. HAVERI-581 193. 2. RAJASHEKHAR HARIJAN, PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, HOSUR, TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 193. - ACCUSED (BY SRI. A.P. MURARI, ADVOCATE FOR A1 AND A2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE THE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST RESPONDENTS / ACCUSED FOR THE WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 23.11.2023 PASSED IN W.P. NO.104248/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE- D AND ETC. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1966-DB CCC No. 100457 of 2025 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) The contempt petition is filed with prayer to punish the accused for violating the order passed in W.P. No. 104248/2023. The order in W.P. No. 104248/2023 is passed on 23.11.2023. The order reads as follows. “3. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-E to E2, in accordance with law preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner relating to plot bearing No. 25/1.” 2. The petitioner has submitted a copy of the order passed in W.P. No. 104248/2023 along with the representation to the respondents in the writ petition on 31.12.2024, which is more - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1966-DB CCC No. 100457 of 2025 than one year after the passing of the order. Thereafter the contempt petition is filed on 03.12.2025. Thus under the circumstances it has to be held that the complainant has initiated contempt proceedings beyond the period of one year which makes it time barred as per Section 20 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 3. For the aforementioned reasons, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed. It is needless to state that petitioner is having the liberty to agitate his rights before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE BVV CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 14