Rama v. State Represented by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/20284/2026 · 2026-07-30
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 57607 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 57607 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 Rama W/o.Mohan, 5/7, Annadurai Street, East Tambaram, Kancheepuram District - 600059. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, CCB Tambaram City Police Station, Tambaram. Crime No.71 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.71 of 2025 on the file the respondent police, pending investigation and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Swamisubramanian For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 of IPC r/w Section 120(B) of IPC in Crime No.71 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first accused impersonated the de facto complainant and executed a power of attorney in favour of the petitioner, but in furtherance thereof, no further action took place based on that document. Hence, the complaint was registered
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been incarcerated since 02.06.2026 and that she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has got one previous case similar in nature, pending against him. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was enlarged on bail in previous case in Crl.OP.No.15637 of
2026. 6. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6
7.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); though the petitoiner has one previous case, considering the fact that the petitioner has been in incarceration since 02.06.2026 and in furtherance of her cheating, no serious consequences have taken place, as the Power of Attorney now stands only in the name of the petitioner. In such view of the circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Tambaram, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019'].
The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner is directed to revoke the power of attorney by declaring that she will never act as an agent for the first accused based on that document, within a period of two weeks from the date of her release or https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 otherwise, the bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 30-07-2026 DRL Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tambaram. 2. The Inspector of Police, CCB Tambaram City Police Station, Tambaram. 3.The Superintendent, Special Prison for Women at Central Prison, Puzhal. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 20284 of 2026 30-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis