Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35387 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 to 3 and Sri Jai Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4.
2. Grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner's property detailed in the writ petition has been acquired by notification dated 04.02.2026. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed objection under Section 15 of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 against the acquisition of her land before the respondent No.2 but the same has not yet been decided.
3. Learned Standing Counsel contends that the matter can very well be considered by the competent authority and therefore, an appropriate direction be issued to the competent authority to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate/Special Land Acquisition Officer, Jhansi within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 8, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Singh, Surya Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jai Bahadur Singh (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Santosh Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad