DR. SABINA ABID ALI BAIG W/O SHRI. BHASKAR UDDE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100333/2022 · 2026-02-12
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5757 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5757 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2176 CRL.P No. 100333 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100333 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
DR. SABINA ABID ALI BAIG W/O SHRI. BHASKAR UDDE AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. AMSA, PLOT NO. 70, 3RD CROSS, KUMARSWAMY LAYOUT, BELAGAVI - 591 108.
2.
SHRI. BHASKAR UDDE AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLAT NO. 304, PARIMALA APARTMENT, JADHAV NAGAR, BELAGAVI - 590 019. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASHANT F. GOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HCGP, HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD - 580001.
2.
SMT. SHRUTI GHATNATTI W/O AMAAN ALI BAIG AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. FLAT NO. 304, PARIMALA APARTMENT, T.V. TOWER ROAD, JADHAV NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590001 ALSO AT. FLAT, NO. 305, SHREYA APARTMENT, BUDHAWAR PETH, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI – 590006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. BHASKAR L. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 03.05.2021 PASSED BY THE IV JMFC, BELGAUM IN PC NO.73/2021 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-A AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONER (ACCUSED) FOR THE OFFENCES
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.13 12:47:10 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2176 CRL.P No. 100333 of 2022
PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 31 PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 ND QUASHING THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.149/2021 PENDING BEFORE THE IV JMFC, BELAGAVI AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONER (ACCUSED).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo. The memo reads as under:
"Herein, the memo on behalf of the Petitioners is as under: It is submitted that, as per the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in Crl.P.No.102234/2021, dated 19.04.2023, both the parties herein have compromised the matter. Thus, the present Petition does not survive for consideration and the same may kindly be disposed off as infructuous in the interest of justice.”
Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SMM / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 2