Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5753 (JHR)

Binod Rakshit v. The State Of Jharkhand

Cr.Rev./987/2017 · 2026-04-08

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9996 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 987 of 2017 ------ Binod Rakshit, son of Shri Niwaran Rakshit, resident of Village – Manjhili Tand, P.O. – Ojhadih, P.S.-Tundi, District - Dhanbad. .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opp. Party ------ Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudeep Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Durga Charan Mishra, Advocate. ------ Order No. 06 / Dated 8th April, 2026 1. The instant criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.03.2017 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Cr. Appeal No. 31 of 2017, whereby and whereunder the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, both dated 27.01.2017 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in G.R. No. 2790 of 2009, arising out of Govindpur P.S. Case No. 239 of 2009 has been affirmed and the petitioner has been convicted under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has already served sentence of rigorous imprisonment of three months awarded to him for the offence under Section 279 of the I.P.C. and does not want to contest the matter on merits, therefore, this criminal revision may be disposed of. 3. Learned A.P.P. has raised no objection. 2026:JHHC:9996 2 4. In view of the above, since the petitioner / revisionist has already served the sentence and there is no contest on merits, therefore, this criminal revision is disposed of. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) April 8, 2026 Sunil/ Uploaded on 09/04/2026