APHC010198222009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 693/2009 Between: 1. S.GOPAL REDDY, S/O. LATE SUNDARAM REDDY BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 27-1-1135, SAIBABA NAGAR, BESIDE SWAMY DOSS SCHOOL, BALAJI NAGAR, NELLORE. ...APPELLANT AND 1. M/S SNEHA AQUA PVT LTD, Registered under Companies Act, having its Regd.office at Hyd, and Regional office at 16/1831, Srinivasa Agraharam Nellore being represented by its Managing Director, SRKVS S.Raju @ Ashok, S/o. SRKVS R.Raju, aged 37 years, ...RESPONDENT aggrieved by the order and decree dated 14-11-2008 in O.S.No. 27 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 2055 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 226 days in re-presenting the appeal and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(ASMP 2056 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 235 days in payment of deficit Court fee of Rs. 15,726/- in the filing the above appeal and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.693 of 2009 JUDGMENT: When the matter is listed under the caption "For Dismissal," it is represented by Mr. T.V. Suman, learned counsel representing Mr. M. Ravindra, learned counsel for the appellant, that he has not received any instructions from his client till today and that appropriate orders may be passed in the present appeal suit. It appears that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal suit. 2. By recording the same, the appeal suit is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 20.07.2026 LSP