IN TH 128 Ramesh Dakshin H CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU the impugn learned Ad remaining examinatio by the learn Civil Revision No.3298 of 2026 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision N Date of decision Versus hin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate for the petitioner. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present revision mpugned order dated 16.3.2026 (An Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Div ining evidence of the plaintiff and ination has been closed by Court orde On 16.3.2026 the following im e learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. D “Today the case plaintiff as well as paym to opposite party. Cost plaintiff is present opportunity. Adjournm O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.3298 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-20.04.2026 …..Petitioner m and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate vision petition is for setting aside 6 (Annexure P-5) passed by the r. Divn.), Siwani, whereby the ff and evidence qua his cross- rt order. ing impugned order was passed e (Sr. Divn.), Siwani :- case came up for evidence of payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- Cost not paid. No evidence of ent despite extended last urnment sought. Heard & VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document has filed restrain the use of an Account N Siwani, Di regularly p connection protection connection written stat 06.05.2024 for recordi Civil Revision No.3298 of 2026 (O & perused the records. P shows affording of thir to the plaintiff to concl of that failed to d cause/reason advanced evidence as well as fo extended last oppo circumstances, no fu plaintiff's evidence is j of the plaintiff is closed case is adjourned to 13 defendants at own re making the payment of interim order to continu The brief facts of the case are filed a suit for permanent prohibit ain the defendants/respondents from of an electricity connection installe unt No. B21KA533660) situated i ni, District Bhiwani. It is asserted th larly paying all electricity dues an ection, with no outstanding liability. ction against illegal and forcible d ection. Upon notice, the defendan en statement. Issues were framed by 5.2024, and the case was fixed for plain The matter thereafter underw ecording of evidence and arguments O & M) 2 ds. Perusals of case records thirteen effective opportunity onclude evidence but despite o do so. No reasonable nced for non presence of s for adjournment despite of opportunity. Under such further adjournment for is justified. Hence, evidence osed by Court order. Now the to 13.04.2026 for evidence of n responsibility as well as t of cost by plaintiff. Till then, ntinue.” se are that the petitioner/plaintiff rohibitory injunction seeking to rom interfering with the peaceful nstalled at his tubewell (Meter ated in Village Mohila, Tehsil rted that the petitioner has been ues and is lawfully using the bility. The plaintiff also sought ible disconnection of the said fendants/respondents filed their ed by the learned Trial Court on or plaintiff’s evidence. nderwent multiple adjournments ments on the interim injunction VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document application The plainti and cross subject to c remaining the impugn petitioner c remaining circumstan Hon’ble Co and grantin the interest would suff (Annexure submits th petitioner h caused to h of notice o further dela above facts petition is a Civil Revision No.3298 of 2026 (O & cation. On 05.08.2024, one witness (P plaintiff himself also appeared as PW cross-examined. However, despite se ct to costs and the last being marked ining evidence could not be conclude mpugned order dated 16.03.2026. Although multiple opportun ioner contends that sincere efforts w ining witness(es), but the same co mstances beyond control. Accordingly, the petitioner ’ble Court for setting aside the impugn granting one effective opportunity to l nterest of justice. At this stage, learned counsel s d suffer irreparable loss if the impugn exure P-5) is not set aside. At the ver its that one effective opportunity ioner herein to conclude his evidence, ed to him if he is not permitted to do so After hearing learned counsel otice of motion is dispensed with at er delay in disposal of the case. Accor e facts as canvassed by learned Coun on is allowed and impugned order dat O & M) 3 ess (PW Ramesh) was examined. as PW1 and was duly examined pite several opportunities (some arked as a final opportunity), the cluded, leading to the passing of portunities were granted, the orts were made to produce the me could not be done due to ioner seeks indulgence of this mpugned order dated 16.03.2026 ity to lead remaining evidence, in unsel submits that the petitioner mpugned order dated 16.3.2026 the very outset, learned counsel unity may be granted to the dence, as grave injustice will be o do so. ounsel for the petitioner, issuance ith at this stage, as it will cause Accordingly, keeping in view the d Counsel for the petitioner, this er dated 16.3.2026 (Annexure P- VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 5) is set a effective o evidence, h deposited w Fund of t Research petition sha to this Cou April 20, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.3298 of 2026 (O & set aside. The learned Court below tive opportunity to enable the petitio ence, however subject to payment of sited within one week from today in t of the Post Graduate Institute of arch (PGIMER), Chandigarh”, fail shall stand automatically dismissed is Court. Disposed of as above. Pending application(s), if any, , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 4 below is directed to grant one petitioner herein to conclude his ent of Rs.30,000/- as costs to be ay in the “Poor Patients’ Welfare ute of Medical Education and failing which, the revision missed, without further reference if any, stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 18.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document