HIREN S/O. RAMBHAI UKABHAI VAJA (KOLI) v. STATE OF GUJARAT
CR.MA/8351/2026 · 2026-04-20
Nikhil S Kariel
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 575 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 575 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 8351 of 2026 ========================================================== HIREN S/O. RAMBHAI UKABHAI VANZA (KOLI) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR. TEJAS M. MEHTA(19123) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR.VISHAL J DAVE(6515) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 20/04/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Leave to amend is granted. 2. Heard learned advocate Mr. V.J. Dave appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Krutik Parikh, appearing on behalf of the respondent-State. 3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State. Page 1 of 6
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
4. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203004250661 of 2025 registered with C Division Junagadh Police Station, Junagadh, for the offence punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4) and 3(5) of the BNS Act and Section 66(d) of the I.T. Act. 5. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that charge-sheet is filed, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail. 6. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent – State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026 the nature of offence and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed. 7. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:- i. Allegation being that the accused had committed the offence of money laundering through the medium of mule accounts and whereas, the amounts in question were the proceeds of cyber crime.
ii. It would appear in this regard that the account did not belong to the present applicant nor the applicant was the principal mover of the original fraud. iii. Rather, it would appear that the present applicant had alleged the role of being a mediator between the co-accused – Jay and the account holder for a commission of Rs. 15,000/-, which amount also does not appear to have been given to the applicant. iv. Beyond coordinating for given the bank account in question, it
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026 does not appear that the present applicant was involved in any later transaction. v. Though, a substantial amount of more than Rs. 3,00,00,000/- appears to have been deposited in account in question and around 50 complaints were registered in the national portal against the account, yet, considering the limited role attributed to the present applicant, and also considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 27.12.2025 and the charge-sheet having been laid, this Court is inclined to consider this application. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40. 8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Page 4 of 6
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
9. Hence, the present application is allowed.
The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No. 11203004250661 of 2025 registered with C Division Junagadh Police Station, Junagadh, on executing a bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned; [e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior intimation to the I.O.; [f] to mark his presence once a month for a period one year before the concerned police station;
10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
R/CR.MA/8351/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026 required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. 11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. 12. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant for being released on regular bail. 13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) PD Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/04/2026 10:51:48