HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31555 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 39 out of 185) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Raghuraj Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Nath, learned counsel for the informatn as well as Sri R.M. Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 193 of 2026, under Sections 5m/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Bakewar, District Etawah, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay of about seven days in lodging of FIR and the fact that there is no medical corroboration of the incident, although it is true that victim has deposed against the applicant; there being no criminal antecedents to his credit and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Baniya Urf Vinod, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kunvar Singh, Raghuraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Baniya Urf Vinod .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) as required. 6. Breach of any of the above condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observation herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 8, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 31555 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad