SANGEETA KUMARI SINGH v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT,
LPA/368/2025 · 2026-04-13
Rajesh Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5748 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5748 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10506-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No.368 of 2025 ----- Sangeeta Kumari Singh, wife of Mritunjay Kumar Singh, resident of village Bonga, Karni, P.O. & P.S. Karni, District Chatra (Jharkhand).
.......... Appellant. -Versus-
1. The Union of India, through the Ministry of Human Resource Department, Shastri Bhawan, C-Wing, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110 001.
2. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.
3. The University Grant Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, P.O. & P.S. Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, District North East Delhi, New Delhi-110 002.
4. The Director, Higher Education and Technical Department, Government of Jharkhand, 3rd Floor, Yojana Bhawan, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi.
5. The Principal Secretary, Higher Education and Technical Department, Government of Jharkhand, 3rd Floor, Yojana Bhawan, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi.
6. The Vice Chancellor, through its Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Sindoor, Ichak, Hazaribagh.
7. Dr. Shatrughan Kumar Pandey, Assistant Professor, Department of History, St. Columba’s College, Hazaribagh.
.......... Respondents. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Appellant : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. CGC For the State : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II For the UGC : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the University : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary, Advocate -----
Order No.03
Date: 13.04.2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant places on record the notification dated 14th February, 2026 issued by the Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh (6th respondent). He submits that in terms
2026:JHHC:10506-DB
2
of this notification, the University has granted one time extension for submitting Ph.D. thesis to the candidates who had registered between 5th May, 2016 and 4th May, 2024. He states that the appellant in this case had registered on 17th December, 2017 and, therefore, would be eligible for the one-year extension now granted.
3. The above position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the University.
4. Accordingly, we take on record the notification dated 14th February, 2026 and in terms of the same, dispose of this appeal. However, we clarify that we have not decided the issues raised in this appeal and, therefore, in future, if any issue arises, the same would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law.
5. At the same time, we hope and expect that the petitioner files his thesis within the extended period, now that the University has granted this one-time concession to several candidates like the appellant.
6. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms without any order for costs.
7. Pending interim applications in this appeal do not survive and are also disposed of.
(M. S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) 13th April, 2026 Sanjay/Rohit Uploaded on 15.04.2026