RAGHAVENDRA S/O IRAPPA MALAGONDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/105314/2025 · 2026-02-11
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5746 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5746 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2161 CRL.P No. 105314 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 105314 OF 2025 (439(CR.PC)/483(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
RAGHAVENDRA S/O IRAPPA MALAGONDA AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE/CABLE OPERATOR, RESIDENT OF RATTIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. RATTIHALLI AND DIST. HAVER.I 581110. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH BADIGER, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY PSI RATTIHALLI POLICE STATION, TQ. RATTIHALLI AND DSIT. HAVERI 581118, R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, DHARWAD 580011.
2.
SHIVAKUMAR S/O BASAVANNEPPA PUTTAPPANAVAR AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF RATTIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. RATTIHALLI AND DIST. HAVERI 581110. …RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 483 OF BNSS, 2023, PRAYING ALLOW THE PETITION AND GRANT THE REGULAR BAIL TO THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN RATTIHALLI P.S CRIME NO. 151/2025) FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS SECTIONS 281, 106(1), AND SECTIONS 134(a) AND (b), AND 187 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 PENDING ON THE FILE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JN.DV) AND JMFC COURT HIREKERUR, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.12 16:10:52 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2161 CRL.P No. 105314 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The advocate for petitioner respectfully submitted as under.
In the aforementioned petition, the Respondent Police have been filed charge sheet. Hence, the said petition has become infructuous, Therefore, the petitioner permit to withdraw the petition as not pressed to meet the interest of justice.”
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
AC, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 3