Rajesh v. State represented by the Sub Inspector of Police
CRL OP/20623/2026 · 2026-07-30
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 57443 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 57443 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 Rajesh ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Manimangalam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.391 of 2025 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.391 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.D.Raja For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.10.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 296(b), 308(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.391 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner threatened the defacto complainant using a knife and abused him in filthy language. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.10.2025 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He further submitted that initially Act 14 was invoked against the petitioner and the same was subsequently revoked by this Court, which factum was not seriously disputed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that no one had sustained any injury and that a major portion of the investigation had already been completed. He also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. 5.
Considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no bad 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 antecedents, the fact that initially Act 14 was invoked against the petitioner and the same was subsequently revoked by this Court, the fact that no one had sustained any injury, and also the fact that a major portion of the investigation had already been completed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 30.07.2026 skr Note:
1.
30.07.2026 skr Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 To
1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal
3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Manimangalam Police Station, Kancheepuram
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.20623 of 2026 30.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis