IN THE HI 135 Pawan Kuma Dakshin Har CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. impugned ju by the learn bearing Civi Vitran Niga respondents 2. petitioner su petition with remedy, if an 3. 4. 5. 09.03.2026 rishu E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H CR-22 Date o Kumar Versus in Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and ano M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Rashi Shahrawat, Advocate Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been ned judgment and order dated 06.02. learned Additional Ditrict Judge, Fa g Civil Appeal No. CA-90-2022 title Nigam, Fatehabad and another vs. dents was allowed. After arguing for some tim submits that she may be permit with liberty to the petitioner to tak y, if any, in accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with th Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2225-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 .… Petitioner another .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA vocate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. s been filed for setting aside the 06.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed ge, Fatehabad whereby the appeal 2 titled as ‘Dakshin Haryana Bijli vs. Pawan Kumar’, filed by the e time, learned counsel for the permitted to withdraw the present to take recourse to the alternative with the liberty aforesaid. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No the ssed peal Bijli the the sent tive RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.