[2026:RJ-JP:12261-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 212/2026 1. Pradeep Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, Son Of Shri Ramswaroop Sharma,, Resident Of Amritpuri Colony, Hindoncity, District Karauli (Raj.). 2. Rajendra Singh, S/o Shri Surja Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 273-Dhani Mahetawali, Ward No. 10, Village Tapipaliya Via Ringeeus, Tehsil Shri Madhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). 3. Pradhuman Sharma, S/o Shri Shyam Sunder Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Amritpuri Colony, Hindoncity, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner Food Safety And Director (Public Health), Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Directorate, Jaipur. 3. Additional Director (Rural Health), Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jaipur-I, Department Of Medical And Health, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jaipur-Ii, Department Of Medical And Health, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 6. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Department Of Medical And Health, State Of Rajasthan, Jhunjhunu. 7. Office Assistant Cum Assistant Administration Officer, Fssa Section, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 8. Girish Kumar, S/o Shri Kishan Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o A-221, Jain Vatika, Behind Choki Dhani, Vatika Road, 12 Miles, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.). 9. Aakash Vijay, S/o Shri Kailash Vijay, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 102-Ganesh Colony, Chandni Chowk, Jhotwara, Jaipur (Raj.). [2026:RJ-JP:12261-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-212/2026] ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 24/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the learned Single Judge has taken into consideration that regularly selected employees of SMS Hospital have been engaged to run the mobile laboratories whereas factually the employees who have been appointed for mobile laboratories are on contract basis and the petitioners who were earlier engaged on contract basis had a preferential right. 2. Appellants may file a review petition, if they so choose. 3. Granting liberty to the appellants to file review petition, the appeal stands disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ RAHUL MIRKHANI/6