Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5740 (ORI)

RANJITA MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMP/351/2026 · 2026-03-23

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 351 of 2026 Ranjita Mishra ….. Petitioner Mr. Dipak Ranjan Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Superintendent of Police, Rural, Cuttack 3. IIC, Kanpur Police Station, Cuttack ….. Opposite Parties Mr. S. K. Rout, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 23.03.2026 Order No. 01. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CRLMP has been filed for admitting this writ application by utilizing the original jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and in ends of justice and in the interest of justice direct the Opposite Parties to immediately register the complaint of the petitioner and apprehend the accused persons, take up proper investigation through Superior Officials of the Department to give justice to the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 2. Mr. D. R. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the allegations have been stated in the FIR submitted to the IIC and to the SP, Rural. 3. After going through the averments in the CRLMP, I find that it is drafted casually without stating relevant dates or facts, I am therefore not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a direction to the IIC, Kanpur p. 2 Police Station to register any case. 4. It is open to the petitioner to avail of alternate remedy which is available to her under law. 5. The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi SAHOO