CRM-M-15953 IN T 241 RAJVEER SIN STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present:- M for Mr *** RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Bharatiya Naga seek anticipator Sections 304(2) Police Station B 2. On the in 30 Po 15953-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da R SINGH ALIAS RAJVIR SINGH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Lovish Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Through the instant petition file Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for cipatory bail in case FIR No.33 dated 304(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bhar ation Baghapurana, District Moga. On 24.03.2026, the following order “Prayer in the present petit the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of ant in case FIR No.33 dated 04.02.20 304(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bha Police Station Baghapurana, Distr PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-15953-2026 Date of decision: 06.04.2026 NGH ….Petitioner ....Respondent UPINDERJIT CHAHAL n filed under Section 482 of the 3 (for short “BNSS”), the petitioners 3 dated 04.02.2026 registered under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at g order was passed by this Court: - petition filed under Section 482 of f anticipatory bail to the petitioner 02.2026 registered under Sections Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at istrict Moga. oner dent f the ners nder 3, at of ner ons , at GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-15953 pet he tha com too on on FIR att Sec ma ha the com at inv 16 is fro pet wh Pu tim inv wh the ad sat 15953-2026 2 Learned counsel for the pet petitioners have been falsely impl he has no concern with the said that the petitioner was not even pr commission of offence. He argue took place on 03.02.2026 but the F on 04.02.2026 i.e. after a delay of on the prosecution story. He argu FIR are taken to be true, even th attributed to the present petitio Section 115(2) of BNS was adde make the offence graver. He furth had already been granted the con the trial Court, vide order dated comply with the said order becaus at the relevant time, and for that investigation and his bail was 16.03.2026. Moreover, the petition is not involved in any other case. from him. Learned counsel has petitioner is ready and willing to when called upon to do so by the in Notice of motion. On asking of the Court, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf time to file status report in the mat Adjourned to 06.04.2026. In the meantime, the pe investigation within a week from to when required by the Investigatin the Investigating Agency. In the admitted to interim bail on furnish satisfaction of Arresting/Investig e petitioner has submitted that the implicated in the present case and said offence. He further submitted n present on the spot at the time of rgued that the alleged occurrence the FIR in question was registered y of 01 day, casting serious doubt argued that if the contents of the en then no specific role has been titioner. He further argued that added by the prosecution only to further argued that the petitioner concession of anticipatory bail by ated 06.03.2026 but he failed to cause he could not arrange surety that reason, he could not join the as cancelled, vide order dated itioner has clean antecedents as he ase. No recovery is to be effected has further submitted that the g to join the investigation as and he investigating agency. urt, Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, half of respondent-State and seeks matter. petitioner is directed to join m today and would appear as and gating Officer and cooperate with the event of arrest, he shall be rnishing of bail/surety bonds to the estigating Officer. The petitioner the nd ted of nce red ubt the een hat to ner by to ety the ted he ted the nd G, eks oin nd ith be the ner GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-15953 sha 48 3. Lea the order dated investigation. 4. Lea Singh, has subm longer required 5. In interim order d petitioner shall Investigating O Section 482(2) o 06.04.2026 Gurpreet 15953-2026 3 shall also abide by the condition 482(2) of BNSS, 2023.” Learned counsel for the petitioner dated 24.03.2026 passed by this Cour tion. Learned counsel for the State, on s submitted that the petitioner has join quired for further investigation. In view of the statement made b rder dated 24.03.2026 passed by this shall continue to join investigation ting Officer and shall also abide by the 82(2) of the BNSS. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No itions as envisaged under Section tioner submits that in compliance of s Court, the petitioner has joined the te, on instructions from ASI Jagtar joined the investigation and is no ade by learned State counsel, the y this Court, is made absolute. The gation, as and when called by the by the conditions as provided under (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No ion ce of d the agtar no , the The the nder AL) GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.