CHETAN SINGH @ RISHIRAJ SINGH SON OF BHAIRU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/475/2026 · 2026-03-25
Bhuwan Goyal, Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5739 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5739 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12514-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail (Suspension Of Sentence) Application (Appeal) No. 475/2026 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.248/2024 Chetan Singh @ Rishiraj Singh Son Of Bhairu Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Chawandiya, Police Station Makrana, District Nagaur Presently Residing At Plot No. 121 (9- B), Hanumant Nagar Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur. (Accused-Appellant Is Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Applicant/Accused-Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaideep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Amit Jindal with Mr. Shailendra Agarwal Mr. Shubham Arora and Mr. Anukram Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 25/03/2026 This interim suspension of sentence application under Section 430 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused-applicant (for brevity, ‘the applicant’) along with the appeal. The applicant has been convicted and sentenced by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan-II vide judgement dated 12.07.2024 in Sessions Case No. 02/21 as under:
[2026:RJ-JP:12514-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-475/2026]
1. Section 396 IPC: Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default whereof, one year’s additional imprisonment.
2. Section 120B IPC: Ten years’ imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/-; in default whereof, one year’s additional imprisonment.
3. Section 341 IPC: One month’s imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/-; in default whereof, seven days’ additional imprisonment. Sentences to run concurrently.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that marriage of his brother-Shri Gajraj Singh is scheduled on 26.03.2026. He further submits that on an earlier occasion also, he was extended benefit of interim bail for writing B.A. Second Year Examination from 30.03.2023 to 03.05.2023 and he surrendered back in time after examination with no allegation of its misuse. Learned counsel submits that his parents are old and he is their only son besides Shri Gajraj Singh whose marriage is scheduled. Lastly, he submits that co-accused- Vineet Singh Gaur has been extended benefit of interim bail by a co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 05.12.2024 on account of marriage of his sister. He, therefore, prays that the application be allowed and he may be extended benefit of interim bail for a period of two days. Although, learned Public Prosecutor, assisted by learned counsel for the complainant, opposed the prayer but, could not dispute that marriage of brother of the applicant is scheduled on
26.03.2026. Heard. Considered. Indisputably, marriage of brother of the applicant is scheduled on 26.03.2026. He was extended benefit of interim bail
[2026:RJ-JP:12514-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-475/2026] to write B.A. Second Year Examination from 30.03.2023 to 03.05.2023 and there is no allegation of its misuse. Co-accused- Vineet Singh Gaur was extended benefit of interim bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.12.2024 on account of marriage of his sister. In the conspectus of aforesaid, we deem it just and proper to allow the application. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The applicant is granted interim bail for a period of two days from the date of his release subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Central Jail, Jaipur.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /10