Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 57382 (MAD)

Vimala v. The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/17272/2026 · 2026-07-28

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 Vimala W/o. Arumugam, Thirukovilur Road, Thiruvannamalai. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police, Wilson Garden Police Station, Bengaluru City, Bengaluru. 2. Arumugam S/o. Kannan, 15th Cross, Malliga Dental Hospital, Ulsur, Cambridge Road, Bangalore - 560 008. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to direct the 1st Respondent to Expeditiously Execute the NBW pending as against the 2nd respondent herein namely Arumugam s/o. Kannan in Compliance with the order dated 01.04.2024 in CC.No.38 of 2022 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, it was reported that the respondent / accused had surrendered before the Trial Court. It is further submitted that, upon such surrender, the Trial Court recalled the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) on payment of costs of Rs.5,000/-. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner expressed concern that substantial arrears are still due from the respondent. It is open to the petitioner to bring the said fact to the notice of the Trial Court and seek appropriate relief in accordance with law. 3. Since the respondent / accused has already surrendered and the Non- Bailable Warrant has been recalled by the Trial Court, no further orders are required in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 28-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No av https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Wilson Garden Police Station, Bengaluru City, Bengaluru. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. av CRL OP No. 17272 of 2026 28-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis