Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5738 (KAR)

ASHOK S/O ARUN KOLHAPURE v. SMT. BHAGYA ALIAS GAYATHRI W/O ASHOK KOLHAPURE

CRL.RP/100251/2025 · 2026-02-11

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2162 CRL.RP No. 100251 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100251 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: ASHOK S/O ARUN KOLHAPURE, AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. A, 74, MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA SOCIETY SHRI KRISHNA NAGAR, NEAR GANAPATHI MANDIR BORIVALLI EAST, MUMBAI, DIST: MUMBAI-400066. …PETITIONER (BY SMT.RAJASHREE S. HAVALDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.BHAGYA @ GAYATHRI W/O ASHOK KOLHAPURE AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. SECTOR NO.31, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT - 587101. 2. KUMARI TRISHA D/O ASHOK KOLHAPURE AGE. 10 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O.C/O. SMT. BHAGYA @ GAYATRI W/O ASHOK KOLHAPURE R/O. SECTOR NO.31, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587101. (SINCE MINOR R/BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E. RESPONDENT NO.1) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. MOT, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (438 R/W 442 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BAGALKOT IN CR.MISC.NO.3/2019 AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.08.2019 AT ANNEXURE-H PASSED BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BAGALKOT IN CR.MISC.NO.3/2019, ON IA NO.1 U/S 12 OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.17 16:59:29 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2162 CRL.RP No. 100251 of 2025 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) This Court directed to file memo of calculation. 2. Smt.Rajashree S.Havaldar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is not co-operating to furnish the memo of calculation. 3. According to the counsel for respondents, there is huge arrears of maintenance to the tune of ₹3,34,000/- at the rate of ₹5,000/- inclusive of the maintenance to the daughter. 4. Since the arrears is not paid and memo of calculation is not filed, placing the submission of Smt.Rajashree S.Havaldar, petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 23