IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1154 of 2026 Decided on 26th February, 2026 Bakshish Singh …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation with regard to the issue raised in the petition, but the same has not been decided by the Authority concerned till date. 3. This petition, accordingly, as prayed for, is disposed of with the direction that let representation of the petitioner be decided, in the light of the averments made therein as well as 2 the judgment being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks by the Competent Authority. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 26, 2026 (Vinod)