Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5735 (CHH)

INDRANATH @ ROHIT LAKDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/21/2026 · 2026-01-13

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2128-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 21 of 2026 Indranath @ Rohit Lakda S/o Govindram Turi @ Admon Lakda Aged About 38 Years R/o. Maghetoli Chowki Aara, P.S. Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh At Present R/o Gali No. 37, Vipin Garden Extension Rajesh Nivas Dwarka, P.S. Mohan Garden Dwarka New- Delhi Through - His Son Sameer Kumar Jadi, S/o Indranath @ Rohit Lakda, Maghetoli Chowki Aara, P.S. Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh At Present R/o Gali No. 37, Vipin Garden Extension Rajesh Nivas Dwarka, P.S. Mohan Garden Dwarka New-Delhi ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Jail) Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Jail Superintendent Central Jail Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The District Magistrate Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Station House Officer Police Station Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Narendra Soni, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Narendra Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate, ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 appearing for the State/respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :- “10.1 To call for entire records from respondents pertaining to petitioner's leave case for kind perusal of the Hon'ble High Court. 10.2 To quash impugned memo dated 22.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) and also to direct respondents to release petitioner on parole under the Chhattisgarh Prisoner's Leave Rules 1989. 10.3 To grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking to leave on parole for 07 days for attending dashkarm and terahi program of his father, but, since the said program has already been completed, hence, he has filed an application i.e. I.A. No. 02 of 2026 for withdrawal of the instant petition. 4. In view of the same, I.A. No. 02 of 2025 is allowed and the instant petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra