Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.4 of 2026 Santosh Kumar Patel and another ..... Petitioners Represented by Adv. - Debasish Samal -versus- Sindhu Kumar Naik and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. - CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 19.03.2026 Order No. 02. I.A. No.499 of 2026 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. This application has been filed at the instance of the Petitioners with a prayer to chance the nomenclature of the present application. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners at the outset contended that challenging the inaction of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sundargarh from Land Acquisition Tribunal in disposing of the Petitioners’ application under Section 33 of the L.A. Act, 1894 for disbursal of undisputed three-fourths (3/4th) amount out of the compensation amount awarded, the Petitioners have approached this Court by filing the present application. Page 2 of 2. 4. On perusal of the record, it appears that the application should have been nomenclatured as W.P.(C) instead of CMP. 5. Considering such submission, office is directed to convert the same to W.P.(C) and list this matter before the appropriate assigned bench expeditiously. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge S.K. Rout