VIKAS SARMAL v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/221/2026 · 2026-02-10
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 573 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 573 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 169 Supp. List-II
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 221/2026 CM No. 531/2026
Vikas Sarmal
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
UT of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
10.02.2026
Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing, i.e., 07.02.2026. Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition, along with connected application, is dismissed in default of appearance and for non prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall also stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu:
10.02.2026 Michal Sharma/PS