Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5729 (GUJ)

BALDEVBHAI KESHAVLAL SUTHAR (DECD)THROUGH SUBHADRABEN BALD v. KANTILAL AMBALAL SUTHAR

SA/110/2012 · 2026-01-20

J C Doshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C/SA/110/2012 ORDER DATED: 20/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 110 of 2012 ========================================================== BALDEVBHAI KESHAVLAL SUTHAR (DECD)THROUGH SUBHADRABEN BALD & ORS. Versus KANTILAL AMBALAL SUTHAR & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6 UNSERVED EXPIRED (N) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 DELETED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR GUNVANT R THAKAR(3801) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI Date : 20/01/2026 ORAL ORDER Advocate’s notice was duly issued to the appellants. Upon service, it transpired that appellant No.1 has since expired, while appellant Nos.2 to 6, though duly served, have chosen not to enter appearance or respond to the proceedings. Such conduct unmistakably evinces a lack of prosecutorial intent on the part of the appellants. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the interim relief, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated forthwith. The record and proceedings, if any, shall be transmitted back to the concerned Court below. (J. C. DOSHI,J) MANISH MISHRA