Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 57269 (MAD)

Thirupathy Mahalincam v. Archana. T

OP/472/2025 · 2026-07-29

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

__________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE OP No. 472 of 2025 and A.NO.1449 of 2026 Thirupathy Mahalincam s/o T.Paramanandam 347, 37th Street, TVS Avenue Annanagar West Ext, Chennai - 600101. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Archana. T D/o K.Petchi Muthu No.31/12, Kambar Street, Kumaran Nagar Ext, Padi Chennai - 600050. ..Respondent(s) Prayer in OP.NO. 472 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 3, 7 to 10 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act 1890 read with Order XXI Rule 2 and 3 of OS Rules, praying to appoint the petitioner as guardian of the person of the minor children Nadish Thirupathy Mahalincam born on 05.01.20213 and Rithish Thirupathy Mahalincam born on 26.06.2015. A No. 1449 of 2026 in OP NO. 472 OF 2025 Thirupathy Mahalincam s/o T.Paramanandam 347, 37th Street, TVS Avenue Annanagar West Ext, Chennai - 600101. ..Applicant(s) Vs Archana. T D/o K.Petchi Muthu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page2 of 3 No.31/12, Kambar Street, Kumaran Nagar Ext, Padi Chennai - 600050. ..Respondent(s) Prayer in A No. 1449 of 2026: The petition filed under Order XIV Rule 3 of OS.Rules and section 123 of Guardians and wards Act read with Section 151 of CPC, praying to grant Interim custody on every Sunday from 10 am to 5 pm of the minor children of the petitioner named Nadish Thirupathy Mahalincam and Rithish Thirupathy Mahalincam. For Applicant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s.B.Senguttuvan ORDER When the matter was listed for hearing on 07.07.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 29.07.2026. When the matter is called today i.e.,29.07.2026, the respondent in OP.No.472 of 2025 alone is present and there is no representation for the petitioner and hence it is clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Original Petition for further proceedings. 2. Hence, the Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, the Application in A. NO.1449 of 2026 is also closed. No costs. 29-07-2026 JRS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________ Page3 of 3 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE J. JRS OP No. 472 of 2025 and A.NO.1449 of 2026 29-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis