- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1845 CRL.P No. 102146 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102146 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MAKTUMSAB @ MUNAN S/O. JALALSAB HAJARATI AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. BELAWADI, AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE ONI, BAILHONGAL 591103. 2. KOUSARBANU W/O. MAKTUMSAB @ MUNNA HAJARATI AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. BELAWADI, AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE ONI, BAILHONGAL 591103. 3. FATIMA W/O. MAKTUMSAB @ MUNNA HAJARATI AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. BELAWADI, AYYAPPASWAMI TEMPLE ONI, BAILHONGAL 591103. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. A.D. NADAF, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DODDAWAD PS , BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVT. PLEADER, OFFICE AT DHARWAD HIGH COURT DHARWAD 560001. 2. BASAPPA S/O. HANAMATH NAREGAL AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. SELF EMPLOYED R/O. BELAWADI TAL BAILHONGAL DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. J. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SE. 528 OF BNSS, 2023, SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED IN SPL.C.NO. 37/2025, PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI, IN CRIME NO. 108/2024 DODDWAD Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.12 16:10:48 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1845 CRL.P No. 102146 of 2025 PS FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/EC. 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 3(5) OF BNS, AND SEC. 3(1)(S), 3(2)(Va) OF SC/ST ACT IN ITS ENTIRETY AND AMONGST THE OTHER GROUNDS AT THE TIME OF HEARING AND THE GROUNDS RELIED IN THE AVERMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. None appears for the petitioners. 2. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation. Though the matter was adjourned in the interest of justice, the petitioners have again remained absent today. 3. Respondent No.2 has filed an application seeking vacating of the interim order. As the said application cannot be considered on merits and the interim order continues to stay the pending proceedings, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC Ct-cmu/LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 39