[2026:RJ-JP:16255] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5778/2026 1. Arbin @ Arvind Bai W/o Suraj, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Kadiya, Police Station Boda, District Rajgarh (M.P.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). 2. Rehana W/o Murarilal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kadiya, Police Station Boda, District Rajgarh (M.P.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nawab Ali Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 91/2026 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Section 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; the petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2026 and recovery has already been effected. He also submits that the petitioners are not required for further investigation; conclusion of trial may take a long time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the [2026:RJ-JP:16255] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5778/2026] petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that one criminal antecedent is registered against each of the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2026 and recovery has already been effected; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Arbin @ Arvind Bai W/o Suraj & Rehana W/o Murarilal are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:16255] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5778/2026] 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/64