2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3569 BA1 No.757 of 2026 Vipin Kumar Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Kushagra Saini, learned counsel for the Applicant appearing through V.C. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.77 of 2026, under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act, registered at Police Station Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has not committed the offence as mentioned in the FIR; there was no public witness of the alleged recovery. He submits that police obtained the signature of the applicant on the blank paper by threat and prepared the alleged recovery memo without knowledge of the applicant. He submits that the polythene does not bear the finger print of the applicant; applicant has no criminal history. He further submits that 438 gram of charas is recovered from the possession of the applicant, which is a non-commercial quantity. 5. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Vipin Kumar be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 11.05.2026 Arti