Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5721 (RAJ)

NEHANURAM MEENA S/O LATE SHRI PANCHU RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1924/2026 · 2026-02-19

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7916] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1924/2026 Nehanuram Meena S/o Late Shri Panchu Ram Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No. 252, Zindo Ki Dhani, Near Vibhag 11, Purani Chungi, Agra Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Presently confined in Jail at Jaipur Central Jail). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor (PP) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. David Mehla with Mr. Aman Manju For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 19/02/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.323/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence under Sections 189(2) 303(2), 121(1) and 132 of B.N.S and Section 4/21 of MMDR Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also further submits that no recovery has been made from the petitioner. He also submits the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:7916] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1924/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Nehanuram Meena S/o Late Shri Panchuram Meena be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the Court concerned on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GARIMA /39