- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2099 MFA No. 105094 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.105094 OF 2025 (ECA) BETWEEN: SRI. HANAMANTAPPA S/O. BHIMAPPA KALAKERI, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O. NEAR SHARANABASAPPA PADAGATTE BASAPATTANA, GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SATHISH M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. BETADAPPA S/O. HANAMANTAPPA WADDAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HIREBENAKALL GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT, NOW AT KUSHTAGI, TALUK. KUSHTAGI, DISTRICT. KOPPAL. 2. SMT. DURAGAMMA W/O. BETADAPPA WADDAR, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. HIREBENAKALL, GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT, NOW AT KUSHTAGI, TALUK. KUSHTAGI, DISTRICT. KOPPAL. 3. SHIVAMURTHI S/O. HANAMANTAPPA KALAKERI, AGED MAJOR, OCC. DRIVER, R/O. BASAVAPATTANA, TALUK. GANGAVATHI, DISTRICT. KOPPAL. Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2099 MFA No. 105094 of 2025 4. THE MANAGER, SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., E-8 EPIP, SITAPUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, JAIPUR-302022. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF THE MORO VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO I. SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AWARD DATED 03.01.2023 PASSED IN WC NO.04/2021 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL AT KUSHTAGI AND THEREBY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4 TO PAY COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. II. HOLD THAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE TO PAY COMPENSATION AMOUNT, THEREBY TO DIRECT AND RESPONDENT NO.4 TO DEPOSIT THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2099 MFA No. 105094 of 2025 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeking withdrawal of the appeal stating that the parties have settled their dispute before the Trial Court and nothing survives for consideration. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. All I.As., in this appeal stand closed. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI YAN CT: UMD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 62