HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1790/2026 Chandra Prakash @ Chandu S/o Gajanand, R/o Village Barkheda, Tehsil Anta, P.S. Anta, District Baran At Present Rent Holder House Of Padma Mahawar, Palayatha House, Mokhapada, P.S. Kaithunipole, Kota. (Raj.) (Presently Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Arvind Bhadu For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.S. Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/03/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No.81/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithunipol, District Kota City, wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2) & 126(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegations levelled against the petitioner, on account of an altercation which occurred between the petitioner and the deceased on 21.10.2025 wherein, the petitioner kicked the deceased in the stomach, the injured/deceased was admitted in hospital and operated on 21.10.2025 and subsequently, he was discharged on 03.11.2025 after recovery. Counsel submits that (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1790/2026] thereafter, the deceased passed away on 08.12.2025 and a delayed F.I.R. has been lodged on 25.10.2025. Counsel submits that there was no intention of the accused-petitioner to cause death of the deceased. Counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.12.2025 and after investigation, charge- sheet has been submitted and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case including the circumstances in which the incident has occurred and the fact that the deceased has passed away, after considerable time from the date of the alleged incident and looking to the fact that the charge-sheet has been submitted and also looking to the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.12.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Chandra Prakash @ Chandu S/o Gajanand arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1790/2026] Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/38