SMT. MARA LAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KRISHNA DIST & ANOTHER
CRP/4947/2017 · 2026-07-15
Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5712 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5712 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010601382017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4947/2017 Between:
1. SMT. MARA LAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST, W/O LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGE 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O BHEEMAVARAM VILLAGE, VATSAVAI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH KRISHNA DIST ANOTHER, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, LAND REFORMS TRIBUNAL, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VATSAVAI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Judgment of the Court of the Chairman, LRAT-Cum-II Additional District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District, passed in Land Reforms Appeal No. 22/2015, dated 30.01.2013, by confirming the order passed by the Land Reforms Tribunal, VIjayawada, Krishna District, in L.C.C.No. 681/J.Pet/75, dated 12.07.2005 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 6424 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1575 days in filing C.R.P against the Judgment passed
2
in Land Reforms Appeal No. 22/2015, on the file of the Court of the Chariman, LRAT-cum-II Additional District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District, dated 30.01.2013, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP 6425 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgment passed in Land Reforms Appeal No.22/20015, by the Court of the Chairman, LRAT-Cum-II Additional District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari. District, dated 30-01-2013, by conforming the
order passed by the Land Reforms Tribunal, Vijayawada, Krishna District, in L.C.C.No. 681/J.Pet./75, dated 12-07-2005, pending disposal of C.R.P. before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4947/2017
ORDER:
Sri M.S.P. Reddy, learned counsel represented on behalf of Dr. Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the matter has become infructuous and that the cause of action does not survive in the present Civil Revision Petition.
2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interim order granted, if any, shall stand vacated.
Consequently, all pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order.
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J
Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4947/2017
Dated: 16.07.2026 BSM