RAM LAL Versus STATE OF HP CRMPM-760 of 2026 06.05.2026 Present: Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. CRMPM-760 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2026 & Cr.MP No.______ of 2026 (CRMPST/3148/2026) Be registered. Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent/State. Till the next date of hearing, though department may go ahead with the departmental proceedings, but compensation of 50,000/- awarded by ₹ the learned Court below shall not be realised from the petitioner. May 06, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge