CWP-12975-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 132 Jagir Singh State of Punjab & others CORAM: HON Present: - Mr. Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate, for Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J 1. The the Constitution of India is seeking direction to representation dated 28.01.2026 seeking protection of his life and liberty. 2. The petitioner is a resident of villa District Gurdaspur. He lent Rs.6,50,000/ Constable in Punjab Police. They entered into an undertaking dated 22.09.2022 whereby respondent No.4 undertook to discharge the liability within a period one year. Respondent filed complaint dated 05.06.2025 before the police authorities. An inquiry was conducted pursuant to which respondent No.4 agreed to discharge his liability by way of cheque confronted, respondent No.4 threatened him with dire consequences. The petitioner preferred representation dated 21.04.2026 before SSP, Batala for protection of his life and liberty 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus State of Punjab & others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Arpit Dua, Advocate, for Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner through instant petition under Article the Constitution of India is seeking direction to representation dated 28.01.2026 seeking protection of his life and liberty. The petitioner is a resident of villa District Gurdaspur. He lent Rs.6,50,000/- to respondent No.4 who is a Constable in Punjab Police. They entered into an undertaking dated 22.09.2022 whereby respondent No.4 undertook to discharge the liability within a period Respondent No.4 failed to honour the undertaking. The petitioner filed complaint dated 05.06.2025 before the police authorities. An inquiry was conducted pursuant to which respondent No.4 agreed to discharge his liability by way of cheque which was dishonoured on presentation. On being confronted, respondent No.4 threatened him with dire consequences. The petitioner preferred representation dated 21.04.2026 before SSP, Batala for protection of his life and liberty which has not been addres IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12975-2026 Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL the petitioner. Mr. Ishan Kaushal, AAG, Punjab. petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to decide his representation dated 28.01.2026 seeking protection of his life and liberty. The petitioner is a resident of village Jaitu Sarja, Tehsil Batala, to respondent No.4 who is a Constable in Punjab Police. They entered into an undertaking dated 22.09.2022 whereby respondent No.4 undertook to discharge the liability within a period of No.4 failed to honour the undertaking. The petitioner filed complaint dated 05.06.2025 before the police authorities. An inquiry was conducted pursuant to which respondent No.4 agreed to discharge his liability which was dishonoured on presentation. On being confronted, respondent No.4 threatened him with dire consequences. The petitioner preferred representation dated 21.04.2026 before SSP, Batala for which has not been addressed till date. of respondents to decide his ge Jaitu Sarja, Tehsil Batala, to respondent No.4 who is a Constable in Punjab Police. They entered into an undertaking dated 22.09.2022 of No.4 failed to honour the undertaking. The petitioner filed complaint dated 05.06.2025 before the police authorities. An inquiry was conducted pursuant to which respondent No.4 agreed to discharge his liability which was dishonoured on presentation. On being confronted, respondent No.4 threatened him with dire consequences. The petitioner preferred representation dated 21.04.2026 before SSP, Batala for VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.29 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12975-2026 3. The petitioner is making allegations against an Offic holding post of Constable. He is under the direct supervision of multiple authorities including Inspector, D 4. The petitioner hereby asked to look into the matter. 5. Disposed of. opinion on merits. 29.04.2026 Vimal Whether Whether reportable 2026 -2- The petitioner is making allegations against an Offic holding post of Constable. He is under the direct supervision of multiple authorities including Inspector, DSP, SSP etc. The petitioner has filed representation befor asked to look into the matter. isposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No The petitioner is making allegations against an Official who is holding post of Constable. He is under the direct supervision of multiple has filed representation before SSP, Batala who is It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No who is holding post of Constable. He is under the direct supervision of multiple who is It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) VIMAL KUMAR 2026.04.29 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document