Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 57058 (MAD)

Selvakumar @ Kuttyselva v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Velayuthapattinam

CRL OP(MD)/14588/2026 · 2026-07-17

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14588 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.14588 of 2026 1. Selvakumar @ Kuttyselva 2. Akatheeswaran 3. Hariharan ... Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, Velayuthapattinam Police station, Sivagangai District. Crime no.78/2021. 2. Narendran ... Respondents PRAYER: To call for the records relating with impugned charge sheet in S.C.No.93 of 2022, on the file of the additional district and sessions court, Sivagangai district and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Hari Haran For R1 : Mr.B.Arun Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.K.Backiyaraj 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14588 of 2026 ORDER The present petition has been filed by A1 to A3 in S.C.No.93 of 2022, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai District, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioners are charged with the offences under Sections 294 (b), 307, 342, 363, 386, 107, 120B of IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959. 2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the defacto complainant has not sustained injuries and therefore, question of invoking Section 307 of IPC would not arise. 3. Pending trial, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 4.Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the charge sheet. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14588 of 2026 5. Considering the above said facts, charge sheet in S.C.No.93 of 2022, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai District, is hereby quashed. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 17.07.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rgm To 1. The Additional District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Velayuthapattinam Police station, Sivagangai District. Crime no.78/2021. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.14588 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. rgm Crl.O.P(MD)No.14588 of 2026 17.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis