[2026:RJ-JP:13940] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Application (Suspension of Sentence) No.72/2026 IN S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 276/2026 Lokesh son of Shri Mukesh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident of Shyamji Naai Ka Makaan, Shamshan Road, Beawar, At Present Poonam Vihar Colony, Beawar, Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, P.P. assisted by Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 02/04/2026 : Instant application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of petitioner under Section 438 r/w 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 alongwith the revision petition seeking suspension of the sentence awarded by the Court of ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.3, Beawar, vide judgment dt.12.08.2025, in Criminal Regular Case No.133/2024 (471/2024) whereby the petitioner was convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo the maximum period of three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine. The said conviction & sentence were confirmed by the Court of ld. District & Sessions Judge, Beawar, vide judgment dt.01.11.2025, in Criminal Appeal No.96/2025. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was on bail during the trial as well as the appeal. [2026:RJ-JP:13940] (2 of 2) SOSA No.72/2026 Presently, he is in judicial custody since long. Counsel further contends that the judgments of conviction & sentence passed by the Courts below, are totally based upon surmises and conjectures, and the revision petition is likely to take a long time to be decided. Hence, the sentence awarded to the petitioner should be suspended during the pendency of the revision petition. Considering the term of sentence, without commenting upon the merits of the case, and taking into account the arguments made at bar, this Court deems it just & proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the petitioner during the pendency of the revision. Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is hereby ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to the petitioner, namely Lokesh son of Shri Mukesh by the ld. Trial Court vide judgment dt.12.08.2025 & affirmed by the ld. Appellate Court vide judgment dt.01.11.2025, shall remain suspend during the pendency of the revision petition, subject to the condition that he shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- alongwith two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the ld. Trial Court, with the condition that he shall appear before this Court on 04.05.2026 and thereafter, as and when directed. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ASHOK