SUPYAR GURJAR D/O SULTAN GURJAR W/O SACHIN GURJAR, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/398/2026 · 2026-03-17
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 570 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 570 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11346] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 398/2026
1. Supyar Gurjar D/o Sultan Gurjar W/o Sachin Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District- Alwar. At Present Current R/o Gugli Ka Gubada, Ajabgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi District- Alwar.
2. Sachin Gurjar, Son Of Hardayal Gurjar, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Gugli Ka Guwara, Ajabgarh, Tehsil Thanagazi, Police Station Pratapgarh, District- Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, District Alwar, (Raj.)
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar, (Raj.)
5. Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur Rural, (Raj.)
6. Station House Officer, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural, (Raj.)
7. Sultan Gurjar Son Of Shri Kanhaiyalal., R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
8. Girraj S/o Sultan, R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
9. Rahul S/o Ganesh, R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
10. Hariom S/o Kanhaiyalal., R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
11. Sardar S/o Kanhaiyalal., R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
12. Nanuram S/o Kanhaiyalal., R/o Village Amka, Post Pratapgarh, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar.
13. Umrav Gurjar S/o Nathuram Bagri, R/o Bagri Ki Dhani, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural.
14. Devraj S/o Nathuram Bagri., R/o Bagri Ki Dhani, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural.
[2026:RJ-JP:11346] (2 of 3) [CRLW-398/2026]
15. Ratan S/o Lekhraj, R/o Bagri Ki Dhani, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural.
16. Ramesh S/o Lekhraj, R/o Bagri Ki Dhani, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 to 16 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj, Moti Katala, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 27.10.2025 and same has been registered on
27.10.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.7 to 16 are not happy with their marriage and
[2026:RJ-JP:11346] (3 of 3) [CRLW-398/2026] petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar, (Raj.) and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /201