Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5695 (ALL)

HITESH AGRAWAL @ GOLDI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/30546/2026 · 2026-09-07

Jai Prakash Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30546 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 855 of 2025 under Sections -338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(2) BNS Police Station -Sahibabad District - Ghaziabad. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant was only the employee of the alleged company.It is also submitted that applicant is having no concern with the allegations levelled against him and he has not committed any offence as alleged by prosecution. It is next submitted that the co-accused Yogesh Kumar has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 07.09.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 8172 of 2026. There is no criminal history against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.08.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, the applicant would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Prakash Singh, Seema Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hitesh Agrawal @ Goldi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed. 6. Let the applicant -Hitesh Agrawal @ Goldi involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions: (i). The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. September 8, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 30546 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad