RIZWAN AHMAD v. UTTARAKHAND STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
WPSS/1309/2026 · 2026-05-18
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5694 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5694 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:3802 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PSS/ 1 3 0 9 / 2 0 2 6 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Mr. Amar Murti Shukla & Ms. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocates for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Lalit Samant, Advocate for the respondents.
3. According to the petitioner, he was entitled to Grade Pay of `4200/ - w.e.f. 2016, however, that benefit was given to him after his retirement in 2024. Another grievance raised by petitioner is that petitioner was entitled to Grade Pay of `4600/ -, however that benefit has not been given to him so far.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer and submits that petitioner be permitted to make representation before the competent authority, highlighting his grievances.
5.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that writ petition can be disposed of by permitted petitioner to make fresh representation.
6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make fresh representation to the competent authority. If he makes representation, within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within four months thereafter.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
18.05.2026
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0 a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9 A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.05.18 17:12:21 +05'30'